File #: 2914    Version: 1 Name: Glare Regulations - PH
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 10/12/2016 In control: City Council
On agenda: 10/18/2016 Final action: 10/18/2016
Title: Hold A Public Hearing To Consider An Ordinance Amending Chapter 92 Nuisances, Section 92.56 Of The Carrollton Code Of Ordinances And Article XXVII Of The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance To Amend, Add, Or Delete Definitions And Regulations Related To Light And Glare. Case No. 07-16ZT2 Glare. Case Coordinator: Loren Shapiro.
Attachments: 1. Result Sheet.pdf, 2. General Project Information, 3. P&Z Minutes 09-01-2016, 4. Ordinance
CC MEETING: October 18, 2016

DATE: October 12, 2016

TO: Leonard Martin, City Manager

FROM: Loren Shapiro, Chief Planner

Title
Hold A Public Hearing To Consider An Ordinance Amending Chapter 92 Nuisances, Section 92.56 Of The Carrollton Code Of Ordinances And Article XXVII Of The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance To Amend, Add, Or Delete Definitions And Regulations Related To Light And Glare. Case No. 07-16ZT2 Glare. Case Coordinator: Loren Shapiro.

Body
BACKGROUND:
This is a City-initiated request to amend the glare regulations in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. The glare amendments will also include changing Section 92.56 Nuisances Glare standards in the City Code of Ordinances.

On December 6, 2011 City Council adopted glare regulations in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and in Section 92 of the Code of Ordinances. The new regulations applied immediately to new construction, with enforcement of retrofit applications of existing lighting deferred until January 1, 2017. The rationale was that, with continued improvements in lighting technology and lower costs, the marketplace would voluntarily transition to new lighting technology which would be compliant with the City's new standards.

As staff began the process of preparing for community outreach in advance of the January 1, 2017 deadline it became apparent that the marketplace was not transitioning to new technology. Over 300 commercial properties across the city are considered non-compliant and would be in violation of the new standards on January 1, 2017. In some instances the cost to retrofit existing lighting technology would be significant. On February 16, 2016 staff presented the issue for review by the Re-Development Sub-Committee in advance of the deadline with several recommendations, including:
* Retain maximum brightness limitations at the property line;
* Retain requirement for shielding on new construction;
* Retain prohibition of mercury vapor lights in new construction;
* R...

Click here for full text